345
Wade
expresses he cannot add
>
mine
a
in
conversations with
and
my many
and other personal friends in China. I have, unofficially private person, answered questions they
respecting
his regret to Mr Marsh they course
anything definite to Mr Hung Chang information. Nevertheless Sir Thomas Ho seems to be under the impression that as correspondance took place
on the subjec put to me of apicem between Li Hung Chang myself when I was at subsequently
on
and
Вл
traffic
20
injserious
and to China.
If I made
any arrangement
or conducted
Govenor of Hong Kong,
of
such arrangements
Peking returns to Flong to my correspondence
corresponden rates
my I have no recollection of
the
لمه
or correspondence,
recorded
in the
alluded to by Sir T. "Wade and I susp would, at the time, have been communicated
deceives him in the version to your lordship and duly
alleged archives at Hong Kong. the subject. How The only proposal made to me about the
Granville of some
his
memory.
Lord
gives
of
Li
Hung Chang
04
a
who was
نند
was.
Inade
Mr Ho Amen
private individual been (with Live time of your lordship's telegram (August 1881) Thomas Wadis entire knowledge and save
a respecting Opium
by in communication with Li Hung Chan who
communication wither his thing Chang the relations between China and Jap and that is the plaw referred to in the it is possible something might have newspaper Extract respecting which I gather from mer Marsh's letter your lordship wrote to
if ther
is Mr
1
recollection.
for information
been written about opium: but it has escaped my
and respecting which
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.